Skip to content

United States regulations currently impose significant restrictions on using a “finder” to raise private equity from U.S. investors and on the ability of companies to pay finder’s fees, or transaction based compensation, to unlicensed advisors who assist them with locating investors.  Generally, under U.S. rules, finders who assist in raising equity from investors in private placements must be registered as a broker-dealer under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  The prohibition on using unregistered finders to raise capital also applies to Israeli companies raising funds from U.S. investors. This can be burdensome on businesses who rely on this source of potential capital, often from small to medium sized private investors. The SEC recently proposed a limited exemption to the broker-dealer registration requirements for finders in certain private placement transactions which, if approved, may allow unregistered finders to assist companies with raising equity investments and legally receive finders fees for their services.

SEC Proposes Exemption from Registration for Finders

On Oct. 7, 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held an open meeting and issued a notice proposing a conditional exemption from securities broker-dealer registration under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for “finders” who assist entrepreneurs and issuers in raising capital through private placements sold to accredited investors (the proposal). The proposal would create two tiers of finders who, if all conditions are satisfied, would allow such finders to be exempt from Section 15 registration requirements. They are:

  • Tier I Finder: A Tier I Finder would be limited to providing to an issuer or its agent contact information of potential investors in connection with only a single capital-raising transaction by a single issuer in a 12-month period. A Tier I Finder could not have any contact with potential investors about the issuer.
  • Tier II Finder: A Tier II Finder could solicit investors on behalf of an issuer, but the solicitation-related activities would be limited to: (i) identifying, screening, and contacting potential investors; (ii) distributing issuer offering materials to investors; (iii) discussing issuer information included in any offering materials, provided that the Tier II Finder does not provide advice as to the valuation or advisability of the investment; and (iv) arranging or participating in meetings with the issuer and investor. A Tier II Finder must provide potential investors, prior to or at the time of the solicitation, disclosures of the Tier II Finder’s role and compensation. A Tier II Finder would also be required to obtain from the investor prior to or at the time of any investment a written acknowledgement of the investors’ receipt of the necessary disclosures.

Assuming all conditions are satisfied by a “finder,” both Tier I and Tier II Finders can receive transaction-based (i.e., commission) compensation for his or her finder services without registering as a securities broker or dealer or an associated person of a securities broker or dealer. However, no finder may be involved in structuring the transaction or negotiating the terms of the offering, handling customer funds or securities, participating in the preparation of any sales materials, performing any independent analysis of the sale, performing any due diligence activity, assisting or providing financing for investors’ purchases, or providing an evaluation of the advisability of the investment.

Read the full GT Alert

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of William Mack William Mack

William B. Mack is a co-chair of the Financial Regulatory & Compliance Practice. He is experienced in advising companies on regulatory and compliance matters relating to the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, the Exchange Act, Anti-Money Laundering laws and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

William B. Mack is a co-chair of the Financial Regulatory & Compliance Practice. He is experienced in advising companies on regulatory and compliance matters relating to the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, the Exchange Act, Anti-Money Laundering laws and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) rules.

William’s practice involves all aspects of broker-dealer regulation, including Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO) membership, supervision, employment, research, soft dollar arrangements, chaperoning of foreign broker-dealers, social media, use of foreign finders, anti-money laundering rules, alternative trading systems (ATS), exchanges, and market making issues. He also provides regulatory guidance to investment banking clients in connection with securities offerings and related trading issues.

William advises firms in the FINRA new membership (NMA) and the continuing membership (CMA) processes. William assists firms to develop or amend their written supervisory procedures and compliance manuals.

William routinely represents clients who are negotiating placement agent agreements, foreign finders agreements, clearing agreements, agreements with registered representatives and expense-sharing agreements.

William assists broker-dealers and their associated persons to respond to regulatory examinations and inquiries and provides effective representation in a range of enforcement proceedings with the SEC, FINRA, NYSE, state and foreign regulatory authorities. He regularly prepares and defends witnesses in FINRA on-the-record interviews and SEC testimony. Enforcement matters have involved issues including market manipulation, supervision, customer defalcations, insider trading, anti-money laundering, distribution of unregistered securities, direct market access, market making, soft dollar arrangements, cross border trading, electronic intrusion and customer impersonation, sales practices, supervision, private placements, ETFs, indexes, and other securities products.

William regularly addresses questions with respect to what activities require or are exempt from broker-dealer registration. William assists firms in obtaining guidance, interpretive letters, and no-action relief from FINRA and the SEC with respect to novel securities issues and the creation of new products and services. William also advises clients on cryptocurrency, tokenization, NFTs, DeFi structures, and digital asset exchanges and trading.

Prior to joining the firm, William was a Principal Counsel for Enforcement at FINRA. Before FINRA, he was the Director of the Executive Secretariat in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. William also served as a Deputy Associate Counsel at the White House, advising primarily on appointments and investigations. Before the White House, he practiced at large firms in New York. William clerked for Judge Robert L. Carter in the Southern District of New York.

Photo of Dale Rose Goldstein Dale Rose Goldstein

Dale Goldstein handles a wide variety of litigation matters, with a focus on securities litigation, trade secret disputes, products liability, and general commercial litigation. Dale has represented and advised major financial institutions, underwriters, investment advisers, and other organizations in connection with investigations by

Dale Goldstein handles a wide variety of litigation matters, with a focus on securities litigation, trade secret disputes, products liability, and general commercial litigation. Dale has represented and advised major financial institutions, underwriters, investment advisers, and other organizations in connection with investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). She is also experienced in handling a range of government investigations and regulatory and compliance matters throughout the country. Additionally, Dale has experience with international criminal law matters.